Hey All!
I have lurked for a long time and haven’t posted, hello hello.
I’m curious as to the group’s thoughts on bridges. It feels reductionist to say it’s simply that a belly bridge can (often) support heavier strings due to its greater surface area and therefore stronger bond with the top.
I ask because I’ve noticed that sometimes a model will have a belly bridge, and sometimes a pyramid. I realize that it can be chosen as a custom option, but I recently saw an 0 with a pyramid that was made last year. All the models, even down to the Baby on the Collings site, are now shown with belly bridges. Albeit the text description for the Baby calls it a “small belly-style” bridge.
So aside from aesthetics and possibly historic reasons, why might someone choose pyramid over belly, or vice-versa? I understand that the conventional wisdom would be to use lighter strings on a pyramid bridge for reasons already mentioned, but… how does its lower mass affect its ability to conduct the string vibrations to the top? Or who cares.
This is quite esoteric, I realize, and maybe not the best question for my first post in years. But I’m curious! So I ask.
Thanks,
Stuart
Bridges
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 5:38 pm
- Real Name: Frank Sanns
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Bridges
Hi Stuart!
I had hoped that others would answer but I guess I will give my one dollar's worth (used to be 2 cents).
It is usually thought that pyramid bridges give better response especially for finger style. Sometimes they may or may not have as much headroom as a belly bridge. Also missing is what is going on underneath. The dimensions of the bridge plate under the bridge can have a large impact on the feel and sound of the guitar.
All bridges are a compromise as are other aspects of guitars. If you are looking for a brighter, snappier sound then a belly, in general is probably a better choice. If looking for more of a 000 feel and sound from an OM, then a pyramid might be the way.
I had hoped that others would answer but I guess I will give my one dollar's worth (used to be 2 cents).
It is usually thought that pyramid bridges give better response especially for finger style. Sometimes they may or may not have as much headroom as a belly bridge. Also missing is what is going on underneath. The dimensions of the bridge plate under the bridge can have a large impact on the feel and sound of the guitar.
All bridges are a compromise as are other aspects of guitars. If you are looking for a brighter, snappier sound then a belly, in general is probably a better choice. If looking for more of a 000 feel and sound from an OM, then a pyramid might be the way.
Re: Bridges
A pyramid bridge is ok with medium gauge strings on the E and B (0.13 and 0.17) strings (at least in standard tuning or lower tension tunings) according to the info I got from contacting Collings
many years ago and I have used them as such ever since on my Collings C10. Keep light gauge on the other strings.
many years ago and I have used them as such ever since on my Collings C10. Keep light gauge on the other strings.
Re: Bridges
Thanks for the replies, fellas.
I got a new guitar with a pyramid bridge and am excited to get to know it. A Collings 01PecanE. 14-fret. New to me but looks like it just left the workshop.
This deviates from the bridge comments but I am pleasantly surprised by taking Engelmann through its paces. They sure know their craft.
And Frank, nice to interact with you again! It’s been too long.
Stuart
I got a new guitar with a pyramid bridge and am excited to get to know it. A Collings 01PecanE. 14-fret. New to me but looks like it just left the workshop.
This deviates from the bridge comments but I am pleasantly surprised by taking Engelmann through its paces. They sure know their craft.
And Frank, nice to interact with you again! It’s been too long.
Stuart
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 5:38 pm
- Real Name: Frank Sanns
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Bridges
Nice to hear from you too Stuart. I miss our chats.
Englemann is an outstanding wood for the smaller body guitars. Too many people chase adi or now the baked woods but Englmann is so responsive and warm. I am surprised it is so overlooked.
I have a classical guitar with such a top. It is killer.
Enjoy your new toy as well as your rare arch top.
Frank
Englemann is an outstanding wood for the smaller body guitars. Too many people chase adi or now the baked woods but Englmann is so responsive and warm. I am surprised it is so overlooked.
I have a classical guitar with such a top. It is killer.
Enjoy your new toy as well as your rare arch top.
Frank