Hi, I have a 2003 0002h (which is a dream!) and 2007 Ds2h, which is fine, and a 2008 DS1 which is a cannon 9i.e. ist is remarkably loud and used to be my bluegrass guitar. In 2023 I bought a 1999 002h, which was, initially tonally pretty dead and had a significant "wolftone" or dead spot on the F# 2nd fret 6th string.
After getting no help from two techs,I decided to hang it in my "office" listening to my old stereo, AND fitted my old Mk1 Tonerite to it for a couple of weeks during the daytime.
It seems to have resolved the wolf tone and seems pretty even, but not quite as "toneful" as, the 000 and DS. Of course it is smaller and whilst "balanced as one would expect from a Collings, I'm just wondering whether there was a tonal, and/or quality shift between 1999 and , say, 2003.
Also the finish is not quite as impeccable as the later models.
Any thoughts ?
Are the newer ones better???
Re: Are the newer ones better???
I currently only have one Collings that was built in 2018 a C100. It is a phenomenal guitar. Previously I owned a D1A a D1Mh and a C10. The D1A was built in 2014 the D1Mh if memory serves correct was built in 02 and the c10 sometime in the early 2010s.the only one I purchased new was the D1A. All of them were fine guitars. I had no problems with any of them, although I did learn that I don’t like the tone or small size of a C10 as my only guitar.
Currently only having the C100 I wold say it is the best of the bunch, although that D1Mh was something special and if I wouldn’t have been going through some financial difficulties it would have stuck around.
My experience with guitars from the early 2000s to 2018 is that they were all very good.
Currently only having the C100 I wold say it is the best of the bunch, although that D1Mh was something special and if I wouldn’t have been going through some financial difficulties it would have stuck around.
My experience with guitars from the early 2000s to 2018 is that they were all very good.