Page 1 of 1
C10 v Waterloo LOO size
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:10 pm
by Lefty
Can someone give me a tone comparison between the 2, please.
Re: C10 v Waterloo LOO size
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:02 pm
by Silly Moustache
No I can't but I'm watching with interest.
I have a WL12, but was once sorely tempted by a C10, which was a delight.
Tho Waterloo is designed to sound like an old Kalamazoo or similar, which I think it does, but the C10 is designed to sound like a Collings which it does.
Re: C10 v Waterloo LOO size
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:41 pm
by godfreydaniel
I have a C10-35 and a WL-14 (x-braced). Both great, but the C10-35 has a somewhat richer sound, and is very loud. (The WL-14 has plenty of volume too, though.) The C10-35 definitely has a more pronounced bass than the WL-14, but still balanced. I used to have a C10 Deluxe G (German over maple, with the long scale). That one had great string separation. As I no longer have it, I can’t compare them directly, but I’m sure both my C10-35 and WL-14 are louder than my old C10.
The richness I mentioned regarding the C10-35 doesn’t sound like an OM. It’s a very “in your face” guitar. Hopefully that makes some sense.